Rebel on Indonesia

[Farabi]

We are on difficult position, rebels on Papua attacked our army. If we attacked back, USA will say we are dictator, if we did not attacked back, our army will die. This is not a game, 1 live is presicous. The army is defending freeport, we are defending USA asset. First the australian politician heard that 1 civilian killed by our army he used this as an attack to insult indonesia, but when he heard that it was for defending USA asset, he suddenly quiet. Is everything for USA is allowed? Even killing people? Please, no offense, we are talking justice here, no extreme nasionalist.

[Astro]

I'm pretty ignorant of what is going on over there. Can you explain the situation?

[Farabi]

Whoa, this is complicated. So the rebel killed 3 USA civillians. And our troop tried to catch the rebels, but they fought back.

The rebels had a reasonable explanation, but killing anyone is not an options. I dont know this case details, but seems our Gov't is discussing this with the rebels right now.

[xanatose]

Whoa, this is complicated. So the rebel killed 3 USA civillians. And our troop tried to catch the rebels, but they fought back.

The rebels had a reasonable explanation, but killing anyone is not an options. I dont know this case details, but seems our Gov't is discussing this with the rebels right now.

The same could be say for all governments. But we all know how all governments came to power :)