A Republican! The Party of Family Values and Religion.
A similar list of prominent Republican figures has been posted on other boards and those who support the Republican Party were asked to compile a list of Democratic hypocrites. They have yet to come up with such a list of revolting sick hypocrites from the Democratic side though it should be pointed out that prominent Democratic figures do not go about preaching they are the Party of family and religious values as the Republican Party loves to do.
Republican Mark Foley Sent sexually laced e-mails to teenaged boys in the Congressional page program for more than 10 years. Chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children.
Republican Ted Haggard leader of the National Association of Evangelicals. Paid male prostitutes for sex and snorting crystal meth. He taught that homosexuality was an abomination.
Republican Larry Craig Senator Liaison for Mitt Romney's Presidential Campaign. Solicited sex from an undercover cop in an airport bathroom.
Republican Bob Allen member of the Florida House of Representatives, Florida Chairman of John McCain's Presidential Campaign. Offered an undercover cop $20 to allow Allen to blow him in a men's room in a public park.
Republican Glenn Murphy National Chairman of the Young Republicans got a fellow Young Republican drunk and then spent the night at his house. When the young man woke up in the middle of the night he found Murphy giving him mouth-to-penis resuscitation.
Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.
Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.
Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.
Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded no contest to having an inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.
Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
Republican Congressman Donald "Buz" Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.
Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.
Republican activist Mark A. Grethen convicted on six counts of sex crimes involving children.
Republican activist Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child.
Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working as a congressional page.
Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.
Republican Congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.
Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. "Republican Marty"), was taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.
Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported in the media.
Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced to jail after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.
Republican election board official Kevin Coan was sentenced to two years probation for soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.
Republican politician Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
Republican politician Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 (i.e. exposing himself to children).
Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.
Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault on a teenage girl.
Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to molesting his two daughters.
Republican Councilman and former Marine Jack W. Gardner was convicted of molesting a 13-year old girl.
Republican County Commissioner Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.
Republican City Councilman Fred C. Smeltzer, Jr. pleaded no contest to raping a 15 year-old girl and served 6-months in prison.
Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and fined $18,000.
Republican city councilman Mark Harris, who is described as a "good military man" and "church goer," was convicted of repeatedly having sex with an 11-year-old girl and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Republican businessman Jon Grunseth withdrew his candidacy for Minnesota governor after allegations surfaced that he went swimming in the nude with four underage girls, including his daughter.
Republican director of the "Young Republican Federation" Nicholas Elizondo molested his 6-year old daughter and was sentenced to six years in prison.
Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A. Dasen Sr., was charged with rape for allegedly paying a 15-year old girl for sex. Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.
Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.
Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.
Bill,
Looks like a great list so to get the ball rolling, how about Clinton and his serious abuse of a good Havana cigar ? :P
The Right will have to come up with perverted Democratic acts for those acts to be counted Steve. As I recall Monica Lewinsky was some 22 years old and the blow jobs she give President Clinton were consensual. That sure isn't anything like molesting kids or having gay encounters and being a hypocrite about it. You know I've had a good many encounters with ladies and the toys we played with myself back when I was a younger fellow, though I must admit none of the toys we played with were cigars. :bg
"Between November 1995 and March 1997, Lewinsky alleged that she had had nine sexual encounters with then President Bill Clinton that, according to her testimony, involved fellatio and other sexual contact in the Oval Office, but that did not involve actual sexual intercourse."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Lewinsky
:bg
Bill,
I take molesting a good Havana cigar with a thing like Monica Lewinsky as a very serious matter, Clinton should have been impeached for bad taste. Still I take your point that the list clearly associates public religious moralising with private personal indiscretions and unfortunately with the exploitation of children so its the old coverup of using the first to hide the second. To be fair I have no doubt that a vast number of people over a variety of religious views live clean well behaved existences in accordance with their religious views and that includes our seriously maligned Catholic friends but it does make the point that people who are flogging public religious morality often have some ugly bad habit they want to hide.
If it were not for our prominent Republicans we Americans would have no need for the word "Hypocrite". :bg
Darn didn't realize that this was a politcaly oriented post when I read the title.
I was going to say that Linux Devs could be a fine example of hypocrits.
Quote
daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
I am a little confused how can someone be between ages ?
I guess that one should read raped his own daughter between and including the ages of 9 "thru" 17.
Now tell me, how sick is that??
Quote from: DarkWolf on September 06, 2011, 06:28:38 PM
I was going to say that Linux Devs could be a fine example of hypocrites.
Not only Linux devs, All Linux users are hypocrites, after all, we deny poor Bill hundreds of dollars by using a free (non cost) OS instead of "god chosen" Window$, not only hypocrites, more like HERETICS
:toothy :toothy :toothy
:bg
Yeah, HERETICS !
Seriously, I would like to see Linux/Unix bring its command line interface into the 21st century instead of its 1980 version. I mean HAY, the command line processor in 1970s in design then you still have file access permissions in OCTAL. Now while various DISTROS have managed a GUI interface which is about as tacky as the later Microsoft ones, intergration of the real power of UNIX would combine both, not one or the other. Windows for all of its irritation CAN do both with very little hassle. Linux is still crippled with the mentality that all you need to know is the ZEN of Electron flow then you will understand the near infinite level of assumptions behind using something as triovial as a command line interface.
Funny enough a 10 years ago REDHAT was easy enough to learn and use. You could install it with no real hassles, you could find the online help easily enough, the compilers worked and the command line interface was reasonably snappy to use, then came the tacky GUIs and SUDO (pseudo :) ) and it all turned to CHYTE.
Quote from: carlos on September 07, 2011, 03:13:47 AM
Not only Linux devs, All Linux users are hypocrites, after all, we deny poor Bill hundreds of dollars by using a free (non cost) OS instead of "god chosen" Window$, not only hypocrites, more like HERETICS
:toothy :toothy :toothy
Yep, I know I'm a bad, bad person (a poor one at that) and oh how I wish hosting companies would give out their services free of charge so I won't have to beg for money in order to keep my site going and give out (for free) so many Masm32 examples created by both my friend Edgar and I in the hope that we can help to keep new comers interested in the incredible art of assembly language for Windows. (Linux sucks !!). :bg
Quote from: hutch-- on September 07, 2011, 04:39:50 AM
:bg
Yeah, HERETICS !
Seriously, I would like to see Linux/Unix bring its command line interface into the 21st century instead of its 1980 version. I mean HAY, the command line processor in 1970s in design then you still have file access permissions in OCTAL. Now while various DISTROS have managed a GUI interface which is about as tacky as the later Microsoft ones, intergration of the real power of UNIX would combine both, not one or the other. Windows for all of its irritation CAN do both with very little hassle. Linux is still crippled with the mentality that all you need to know is the ZEN of Electron flow then you will understand the near infinite level of assumptions behind using something as triovial as a command line interface.
Funny enough a 10 years ago REDHAT was easy enough to learn and use. You could install it with no real hassles, you could find the online help easily enough, the compilers worked and the command line interface was reasonably snappy to use, then came the tacky GUIs and SUDO (pseudo :) ) and it all turned to CHYTE.
I now, officially worship at the temple of Hutch.
Linux was philosophically designed to take the best concepts of Unix systems and Windows as well as any other system at the time and mash them into a coherent, responsive package from the kernel level. Somehow the Linux distro has become Lnux and the Linux kernel is treated like a second citizen more to amuse the Linux communal alpha males. More fantastic to me is that the system that is Linux is never Linux but a Unix like system when it is clearly unique. It should cause no friction in understanding that the lack of insight and the ability for these self proclaimed Linux gurus to pick on the obvious is the same blessing in the development of tools and chains that take on the characteristics more to the chain side of their lineage shackling everything in the basement. It is truly the blind leading the blind -- will it ever end -- and I really don't see any solution except watch and wait while perusing the obituaries.
I always get a little p.o.d when I think about how these entities declare ownership and superiority based on their throttling of new-bees and a couple of useless, broken down perl-scripts that sucked when they were kewl, after all Linux is cheap or was it free? I get lost in the details sometimes, but I was always the black sheep. The shells really do need to come into the new millennium, but they could stay just as they are for purists while newer ones were developed -- at any rate we have too many of those old hands living their mid-life crisis existentially through the newb community and that takes allot of time and we only get 24 hours in a day.
I apologize for all of that -- I was obviously having a moment -- it might be time for a time out in the thinking chair.
Quote from: RDRush on September 10, 2011, 12:40:38 AM
Quote from: hutch-- on September 07, 2011, 04:39:50 AM
:bg
Yeah, HERETICS !
Seriously, I would like to see Linux/Unix bring its command line interface into the 21st century instead of its 1980 version. I mean HAY, the command line processor in 1970s in design then you still have file access permissions in OCTAL. Now while various DISTROS have managed a GUI interface which is about as tacky as the later Microsoft ones, intergration of the real power of UNIX would combine both, not one or the other. Windows for all of its irritation CAN do both with very little hassle. Linux is still crippled with the mentality that all you need to know is the ZEN of Electron flow then you will understand the near infinite level of assumptions behind using something as triovial as a command line interface.
Funny enough a 10 years ago REDHAT was easy enough to learn and use. You could install it with no real hassles, you could find the online help easily enough, the compilers worked and the command line interface was reasonably snappy to use, then came the tacky GUIs and SUDO (pseudo :) ) and it all turned to CHYTE.
I now, officially worship at the temple of Hutch.
Linux was philosophically designed to take the best concepts of Unix systems and Windows as well as any other sytsem at the time and mash them into a coherent responsive package from the kernel level. Somehow the Linux distro has become Lnux and the Linux is treated like a second citizen. More fantastic to me is that the system that is Linux is never Linux but a Unix like system when it is clearly unique. It should cause no friction in understanding that the lack of insight and the ability for these self proclaimed Linux gurus to pick on the obvious is the same blessing in the development of tools and chains that take on the characteristics more to the chain side of their lineage shackling everything in the basement. the blind leading the blind -- will it ever end?
I always get a little p.o.d when I think about how these entities declare ownership and superiority based on their throttling of new-bees and a couple of useless, broken down perl-scripts that sucked when they were kewl, after all Linux is cheap or was it free? I get lost in the details sometimes, but I was always the black sheep. The shells really do need to come into the new millennium, but they could stay just as they are for purists while newer ones were developed -- at any rate we have too many of those old hands living their mid-life crisis existentially through the newb community and that takes allot of time and we all only get 24 hours in a day's time.
No, I think hutch-- would be opposed to organized religion in his name but I bet he would gladly accept our tithe :bdg
The CotP (Cult of the Penguin) will always keep users subjugated with their cheap offerings and hollow promises. How many times now have we been told it is the next best thing ?
If it's not the organized institution of the Roman Microsoft Church or the Orthodox Macs it's the radical fundamentalism of the Penguin.
You can't spell fundamentalism without "mental"
Linux is ubiquitous.
Phones, Servers, DVRs, Home/Process controls, UAVs,
We didn't get the year of the desktop but we got just about everything else.
There's probally a bunch of those in Conservatives' side no?
I will tell you the definition of honor:
"The things that are I say, I do."
An hypocrite is a person with no honor.
Quote from: hutch-- on September 06, 2011, 12:01:08 AM
I take molesting a good Havana cigar with a thing like Monica Lewinsky as a very serious matter, Clinton should have been impeached for bad taste....
Nah.. it's Monica that should be 'flogged' for bad 'taste'...
:bg
Whoa, I never expected politics on USA is harder than I know, you know, Racismt sentimental, into religious false accusation, like what obama endure. I think lots of religious people need to see their own self than pointing anyone. It is the same here, the religous preacher talk until their mouth dry bringing religions to politics, accusing anyone not on the same opinios is a demons. For example, Gus Dur who tried to calming religious war, accussed as a 666 by both muslim and Xtian. Both are stupid, and both are hypocrytes. Xtian always talk about following Jesus step by keep patient, but it was only if they are not armed, if they had a bomb, it would be a different cases :green. Muslims? Well, I dont see any different between religions, I think they both had the same fundamentalist etchic code, "Lips Service".
Well, for money, I'll do everything too. Abraham faith is the same, allowing their leader to pick a tax, who'll miss it? I wont do it anyway, why should I quit from my job when I need it? You wont do it too.
Nah. I think it is not me the demon is, it is them. Look at them, they doesnot even realize if they are hating each others, but they are so experienced when pointing anyone mistake, lots faster than Im typing or playing a games, hell, Im get used to it after 6 years. :green Theyr good at their professions.
Quote from: Bill Cravener on September 05, 2011, 01:05:11 PM
A Republican! The Party of Family Values and Religion.
Oh, Jesus! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdHuwXwcUm0) ::)
Quote from: jj2007 on December 10, 2011, 09:45:20 PM
Quote from: Bill Cravener on September 05, 2011, 01:05:11 PM
A Republican! The Party of Family Values and Religion.
Oh, Jesus! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdHuwXwcUm0) ::)
Yes.. my son.. :8)
All political parties are dispisable.... :tdown
Hi Van.
All politicians are narcissistic scum but in my country one party is scummier then the other. I think you know which party I believe that is. :bg
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/e23d1c26d4/jesus-responds-to-rick-perry-s-strong-ad?rel=player
Quote...in my country one party is scummier then the other
not sure i agree with that - they are all pretty scummy - lol
it takes a certain type of personality to become a politician - and there inlies the problem
the personality traits required are the same ones that screw us
it's a similar situation for being a cop
most cops are control-freaks with side-order of redneck - lol
Bill,
The following video was even funnier.
Dave,
I could not agree more on the type of people that often make politicians or pigs. I basically hold the view that the people best suited for those jobs don't want those jobs. Can you imagine a person who wanted to see society become an equitable place selling their arse to become a politician ? Even harder to fill would be anyone who wants to protect society when you have laws made by politicians to line the pockets of the rich by screwing the poor ever becoming a pig ? You get R_Soles doing both as they are part of shafting ordinary people to make the rich richer.
It has always been my belife that those that are drawn to power, are not who we need in power,as Hutch says. The best person to lead is the person who has no personal agenda other than doing what is best for the people. It is those people however that are not drawn to run for these positions.
Here's the way I see it, like it or not we have a two party system here in the States and if you vote (you do vote don't you?) you must choose a side that best represents your own beliefs. In my case the Republican Party doesn't even come close so I side with what I see as the least evil and that is the Democratic Party. The Democratic party, founded by Thomas Jefferson, shares the same ideals as our nation's motto: E pluribus unum- "Out of many, one." We stand for Liberty, Justice, Equality (For All), Community, Strong Middle Class Jobs, Defense of our Shores (not the shores of others), Modern Infrastructure (ours is in bad need of repair), Economic Stability, Prosperity (for all, not just for oneself), Energy Independence, and Environmental Protection just to name a few. I know both sides can be evil and greedy but as an American voter you must choose a side. Now if you support big corporations, are only concerned for oneself, against equal rights for all, desire wars for profit, dislike those with less then you (such as the poor and those less fortunate), think that if you can't afford health insurance and get sick just hurry up and die, hate gays and lesbians or those who do not believe in a god then perhaps the Republican Party is best for you. I'm just saying. :bg
I agree 100% with you Bill,I do wish greed and corruption was not an issue,but when large sums are involved then someone will try to sneek a piece of it. I believe in the American dream,but it seems some believe it is only for a few,and not for all.
You know Bill's post makes me think of the Koch brothers, not to say that I don't agree with Bill, I am a staunch supporter of the social responsibility of government. But I remember hearing the Koch brothers comment on their rabid anti union stance and their financial support for union busting politicians. They said that unions were socialist and therefor un-American. So that got me thinking are there any other un-American things out there ? Since the whole union thing is simply a group of people electing someone to negotiate for and represent them, what else falls into that category ?
1) The United States federal government and every State government
2) Families
3) Publicly held companies and by proxy the stock market
It's time we did away with all of these socialist (dare I say communist) institutions and help them to stamp out the RED THREAT. I mean if people are allowed to subscribe to successful collective bargaining they may actually begin to demand that their government actually start acting in their interest and that my friends is unacceptable. Time to stamp out unions, governments, families, and corporations they are all just socialism in disguise and waiting to destroy the American way of life.
Touché Edgar,
Ah yes, the billionaire Kock brothers the great tea-bagger backers founded by longtime Republican hack Sal Russo and Howard Kaloogian they who organized many cross country convoys and so called town meetings for their beloved right wing candidates. Those who wish to clear out the hornet's nest of demonic tax and spend liberal scum. And yet it was clear from the start that this insurgency was fraudulent from the very outset. Its real interest and goals are simply camouflaged by fancy campaign rhetoric. They have no intention of renewing American freedoms or any intent in taking America back for the "little guy". There first and foremost priority is to dismantle Social Security, junk Medicare Medicaid and kill Unemployment Insurance just for a start. What an evil pair they be!! :tdown