Whats new:
----------------
2.2.1.8f
o Adding a project file keeps the expanded / collapsed state of the project browser.
o The expanded / collapsed state of the project browser is saved to the project file.
o You can no longer delete a group with sub groups using the Project Groups tool.
You must delete the sub groups first. In previous versions this caused a group messup.
o Fixed a bug in RAEdit when drawing the tab markers.
Get it here:
http://radasm.cherrytree.at/
Firs time installers or updating from an older version should get the complete package:
http://radasm.cherrytree.at/download/?did=40
KetilO
Thank you! I will check it out.
It should be noted, however, that if you just download the IDE without adding the assembly package RadASM will not start. It shows:
"Could not open the file: <EXE_DIR>\masm.ini"
Nick
Hello!
It should be noted that both in f and g versions Project explorer lets you change the name of the group, but this is not a persistent change. On reopen or on refresh (!) old names will be restored.
As a feature request, I would like to be able to move groups around in Project Explorer with mouse. This is possible only in Project Groups manager. I'm thinking, in fact, at a new pool. :bdg Project Groups has little functionality. Why not drop it and let all these features (like add, delete, edit, move) be available in Project Explorer?
Nick
Also, I will not start a new thread for this.
Expanded / Collapsed state is trashed (full expand) when Project Options are changed.
EDIT: Another one: GROUP08 in Colors and Keywords retain the color but RadASM does not use it. All words in this group use default (text color) in editor.
(INVOKE, .BREAK, .CONTINUE, ....)
ANOTHER EDIT:
It looks like the problem comes from retaining the old masm.ini (from previous versions). With a fresh new one and version .9, the problem does not show any more.
However, I must say I can't see any notable differences between these two files.
Nick
:red
Hello,
Can we have an option to disable "Accept command" dialog?
http://www.masm32.com/board/index.php?topic=12201.0
With the useful "check for updates" implemented I would hate to have to compile radasm just to disable this.
Regards,
drizz
I vote for that, too!
Nick