Print Page - BTH_ADDR is ULONGULONG?

Title: BTH_ADDR is ULONGULONG?
Post by: jacksheppard on November 11, 2009, 11:51:44 PM

Hello, ULONGULONG is not defined in WINDOWS.INC

ULONGULONG TYPEDEF QWORD is well defined?

thank

Title: Re: BTH_ADDR is ULONGULONG?
Post by: MichaelW on November 12, 2009, 02:04:44 AM

I can't find a definition for ULONGULONG in any header file on my system, but according to this (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd897589(VS.85).aspx) it is a 64-bit value, so I would guess that it's the same as a ULONGLONG, and the information for that is here (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa505945.aspx). So I think:

ULONGULONG TYPEDEF QWORD

is correct.

Title: Re: BTH_ADDR is ULONGULONG?
Post by: jacksheppard on November 13, 2009, 12:45:08 AM

thanks!

The MASM Forum Archive 2004 to 2012

General Forums => The Campus => Topic started by: jacksheppard on November 11, 2009, 11:51:44 PM