my new public software

[wook]

hello, this is pack of my applications for public usage, most of them are in development process and i need your opinion on every single thing related to them, from ui to code :D
thank you very much

wook

download:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/3mmnttqz2mo/stwoowerks.rar

description:
powermgr is application for desktop power management :D, mainly displays usage of SetLayeredWindowAttributes
rammgr is application that deals with processes, windows and threads.
visxp is application for making transparent start menu and taskbar, i am up to write support for changing wallpapers, but that later maybe.

[hutch--]

Wook,

It looks like interesting stuff but I am yet to see what it has to do with an assembler forum. The RAR file is a collection of binaries with no source code.

[jj2007]

We can disassemble everything and comment the sources :green2

[vanjast]

The RAR file is a collection of binaries with no source code.

No see.. No can do !!

[BlackVortex]

No description of the proggies ?   :(

At least they seem to be in MASM.

[BytePtr]

Trojans.

[wook]

well, for now they are executables only, in easycode.ms, but not finished, allso, i dont like to post sources from something already figured/made in any way, if i discover/invent/made something never done before in masm community, i will be more than happy to share code :)

i just wanted community comment on user interface of my apps.

also, yes, it can be dasmed :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D hehehehehe

[wook]

Trojans.

?????????????????????????????????????????

[wook]

Wook,

It looks like interesting stuff but I am yet to see what it has to do with an assembler forum. The RAR file is a collection of binaries with no source code.

very much happy for your post in my topic
:U

[hutch--]

wook,

The problem is this, while we have nothing against you and consider you have been generous in posting your applications, the risk for people in here is with someone they don't know who posts binaries as their first posting leaves them at risk if the binaries contain any nasty code. For me to look at them I have to set up some method of testing them so there is no risk to my own computers then run them to see what they are doing. Its reasonably common for members to post working binaries that don't aleways have the source but its from people who are well known among members.

Its certainly no insult and no-oe is accusing you of anything but unknown software fom unknown sources is a risk that everyone should be aware of including yourself. Try posting a few pics or a link to those pics so we can have a look at the interfaces and write some description as to what the apps do. I have no doubt that once people know you they would be happy enough to try out your apps.

[wook]

wook,

The problem is this, while we have nothing against you and consider you have been generous in posting your applications, the risk for people in here is with someone they don't know who posts binaries as their first posting leaves them at risk if the binaries contain any nasty code. For me to look at them I have to set up some method of testing them so there is no risk to my own computers then run them to see what they are doing. Its reasonably common for members to post working binaries that don't aleways have the source but its from people who are well known among members.

Its certainly no insult and no-oe is accusing you of anything but unknown software fom unknown sources is a risk that everyone should be aware of including yourself. Try posting a few pics or a link to those pics so we can have a look at the interfaces and write some description as to what the apps do. I have no doubt that once people know you they would be happy enough to try out your apps.

thank you, i am aware of it, and i will make scshots right now, and edit first post ;)
thanx.

btw, i am watching donkeys topic about gdi+ and png2bmp.
i tryed it yesterday, pnglib too, but as far as i could see, there is no way to make semitransparent bitmap, is there any other better lib???

and one thing i allways wanted to ask you, the way of packing qeditor is not standard.
do you have intention to release packer you used with it? :)

[BlackVortex]

Qeditor is  packed with PECompact. If we're talking about the same version.

Use exeinfope, it's one of the best file analyzers.

[wook]

thank you BlackVortex :)
i used some tools suggested by ap0x :D
hehehehe

[hutch--]

I use PEcompact because it is fully DEP compliant and while its not very good on really small files, its compression ratio with the combined Jibz/Collake algo is competitively good on anything over about 10k. I design apps of that type for compression as the app loads faster and it forces the complete app to load at startup which is the characteristic I want with it. There is nothing particularly secret about its guts, just a lot of very compact code.

[BlackVortex]

Yep, PECompact is one of my two favourite packers (at the moment)

As far as size is concerned, tt can't beat upx in brute mode :
upx.exe -i --ultra-brute

@hutch
Weren't you using FSG2.0 or something like that ? And after an XP security update that added FSG2.0 all the tools were crashing ? It took me an hour to figure out what was going on, I thought I had a virus and compressed files were getting corrupted,lol